Burns William Image 1 Worcestershire 1907

Burns William Image 1 Worcestershire 1907

£8.95£49.95

Please choose your photo size from the drop down menu below.

If you wish your photo to be framed please select Yes.
Note: 16″x 20″not available in a frame.

Images can also be added to accessories. To order please follow these links

powered by Advanced iFrame. Get the Pro version on CodeCanyon.

SKU: burns-william-image-1-worcs-1907 Categories: , Tags: ,

Description

Rugeley, Staffordshire born William Burns was a right-hand batsman and a right-arm fast bowler who played for Staffordshire in Minor Counties cricket when only 16 years old, and his first class debut came when he represented Worcestershire against Oxford University at The Parks in May 1903, making 3 and 35. He also played that season against Cambridge University and The Philadelphians, but could not appear in the County Championship because he had not yet qualified through residency.

In 1904 Burns became a regular for Worcestershire, appearing 19 times, and he finished with 834 runs at 26.00, including an innings of 165 in 180 minutes against Oxford University. In 1906 he hit 1,206 first class runs at 43.07, with another innings of 165 against Oxford among his three centuries. That winter he visited New Zealand with Marylebone Cricket Club (M.C.C.): he twice passed 50 in 11 innings and dismissed Wellington’s Harold Monaghan.

In the four summers after the 1907 season, he passed 1,000 first class runs, in 1908 hitting three centuries as he had done two years earlier. In 1909, he scored over 500 runs in five matches and he made his career best score of 196 against Warwickshire. He and Ted Arnold shared a fifth wicket stand of 393, which as of 2017 remains a Worcestershire record for this wicket. The innings and 233 run victory margin remained Worcestershire’s widest until 2002.

Burns also developed his bowling. In 1908 he sent down 633 deliveries, almost twice the number he had bowled in his first class career up to that point, and claimed 16 wickets at 28.50 including a haul of 6-110 against Hampshire. In the following three seasons he bowled around 2,000 deliveries each summer, claiming a total of 145 first class wickets, and recording career-best figures of 7-58 for the Gentlemen against the Players at The Oval in July 1910. This was the first of three appearances he made in such matches.

In 1912, Burns scored only 599 runs and took only six wickets in his 22 matches, but the next season he recovered his form, with the ball especially, and ended with 42 first class wickets at 30.81, as well as 866 runs at 27.06. He made his last hundred, 102 not out against Gloucestershire in June 1913, while he claimed six wickets in an innings twice: once against Hampshire in July, and once in his very last first class game, Worcestershire’s innings victory over Somerset in late August. He took one final wicket in the second innings of that game: that of Len Braund. During his career with Worcestershire he also filled in as captain on a number of occasions when the usual incumbents were not available.

According to David Frith’s book The Fast Men, Burns was an exceptionally quick bowler. Frank Chester, who played against him before the War, named him the fastest bowler that he ever saw, ahead faster than Harold Larwood, but he was handicapped by suspicions that he threw.

In 217 first class matches he scored 12 centuries and 48 half centuries, scoring 9,479 runs at an average of exactly 27. As a bowler he took 214 wickets at an average of 29.59 with 8 five wicket innings and one ten wicket match, his best performance being 7-58. He also took 147 catches.

In the First World War, he joined the Worcestershire Regiment of the British Army and served as a Second Lieutenant in France. He was killed in action at Contalmaison during the Battle of the Somme aged 32 on 7th July 1916.

Burns’ obituary in Wisden described him as a “dashing, hard-hitting batsman” but added that his bowling, which he scarcely pursued until the middle of his career, had to be considered suspect: “the fairness of his delivery was often questioned – and not without good reason”.

Additional information

Weight N/A

You may also like…

Go to Top